The short answer

Melanotan I and Melanotan II are both synthetic analogues of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone. They were made in the same Arizona laboratory and they share a name. In structure, receptor selectivity and regulatory history they are different molecules.

PropertyMelanotan IMelanotan II
Other namesAfamelanotide, [Nle4, D-Phe7]-alpha-MSHMT-2, MT-II
StructureLinear, 13 residuesCyclic, 7 residues, lactam bridge
Molecular weightAbout 1647 DaAbout 1024 Da
Receptor profileMC1R-preferringMC1R, MC3R, MC4R, MC5R
Licensed anywhereYes, as Scenesse (implant)No

Structure

Melanotan I keeps the full length of the natural hormone and makes two substitutions: norleucine for methionine at position 4 and D-phenylalanine for L-phenylalanine at position 7. These two changes make it far more stable than alpha-MSH while leaving the linear chain intact.

Melanotan II goes further. It cuts the chain down to the core residues that bind the receptor and closes them into a ring with a lactam bridge. A shorter, rigid ring binds more tightly and survives longer, and it also loses the selectivity that the longer chain carries.

Receptor selectivity

This is the difference that matters pharmacologically. Melanotan I acts mainly at MC1R, the receptor on melanocytes. Melanotan II acts at MC1R and also at MC3R, MC4R and MC5R, which are found in the brain and in other tissues. The reported effects of the two peptides in animal and early human studies differ accordingly, and so do the adverse events reported for each. The full receptor table is on the Melanotan II identity page.

Regulatory history

Afamelanotide, the pharmaceutical name for Melanotan I, was taken through clinical development by Clinuvel and holds a marketing authorisation in the EU and the UK as Scenesse, a subcutaneous implant indicated for adults with erythropoietic protoporphyria. That is a specific product, strength and indication, and it describes nothing about a research vial.

Melanotan II was studied in the 1990s and was not taken to authorisation. It has no licensed product anywhere. Its metabolite bremelanotide was developed as a separate medicine.

"Which is better" is the wrong question

The phrase appears in the search data, usually with "reddit" attached. For a laboratory, neither is better. They are two reagents with different receptor profiles, and the choice depends on which receptor question is being asked. For anyone considering them for personal use, both are unlicensed for that purpose in the UK, and the MHRA has warned specifically about melanotan products.

The catalogue item is the Melanotan II 10mg research vial, with a batch certificate in the COA publication status. Melanotan I is not currently listed. Reports of adverse events associated with unlicensed Melanotan II products are summarised in Melanotan II adverse effects.

EPS documentation

Use the research catalogue to check the exact name, labelled amount and format. The COA library publishes the original Janoshik reports selected for EPS, retaining the original report client name and any missing batch fields. Literature findings and another supplier's analytical results are not evidence about an EPS batch.